rain in my heart update mark
Although this had a huge dramatic effect upon the viewer and it allowed the viewer to analyse the particular situation multiple times, I felt that Paul Watson was portraying them as if they were less in control of what they were saying, almost as if they were crazy. Chapter 1. Rain in My Heart was Paul Watson's good deed in this naughty world. There were a couple of moments where I felt that he distracted from what we really should have been looking at. Two of the participants in Paul Watson's Rain in My Heart died during filming. For before the revealing of the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on the mouth and cheek. Mark may well have been a grey area and I wasn't sure whether he was so unhappy because of the drink or if he was using the drink because he was unhappy. In addition, how is one to really define what constitutes as being exploitative? A prime example of exploitation was the most vulnerable and interesting subject-Vanda. Throughout the documentary there are cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process. During the documentary, Mark (one of Watsons subjects, aged 29) states that he agreed to do filming for Paul to show people why they should not drink alcohol. This scene is perhaps one of the more uncomfortable in the film as Watson is merely documenting Vandas relapse back to alcohol and the range of mood swings she encounters. Therefore, i dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within the film. It brings to light the seriousness of alcoholism, and how it may affect more than just those who drink in excess, i.e. I personally believe that the word exploit is quite a harsh word to put on the filmmaker without full justification, its made clear that the subjects wanted to be filmed, Watson treats this permission with a good amount of respect both for the subjects and the topic of the documentary whilst at the same time sustaining his role as the stand back and sympathetic-ear presence. One ethical issue that could be introduced at this point is how certain filmmakers victimise their subjects. Overall were the subjects happy to be on film? Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. I think theyre happy for the attention, to have someone to listen. I also believe Watson tried his best to tackle these accusations, baring in mind that overdoing it throughout the documentary could appear to undermine the actual traumas of the patients and their families. He witnessed some horrific scenes throughout filming and only once (that I can recall) did he step in to hand Mark a sick bucket and express disappointment to Venda for her choosing to buy a bottle of vodka. After watching this documentary i get shock of the people shown. I didnt expect Rain in my Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, though we were warned. Post Thanks / Like Thanks (Given) 0 Thanks (Received) 0 Likes (Given) 0 Likes (Received) 0 It deals with a very sensitive issue that affects everyone from viewer to the family of the alcoholics that were taking part in the film. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com. However, Watsons humanity and compassion shines through. Watson stated at the very beginning of the film that he would not intervene in the lives of the people he was filming and would not stop them from drinking if they relapsed. He never appeared to be controlling or interregative in a dominant sense, he remained calm when interviewing his subjects and took their replies without expresing his personal opinion. I do not believe that Paul Watson was dealing with the accusations successfully, but I also do not believe that he was making this film completely selfishly. An example could be when Vanda talks about the monsters in her head, one of the monsters being her abusive father, that pushed her into the terrifying world of self-harm. With a limited number of options given that he had great difficulty finding a location and subjects to film it was essential that Watson was able to capture the gritty reality of alcoholism and addiction in a way that will haunt the audience for some time. Whilst considering the methods that Watson used to gain the footage and despite my previous comments being slightly negative, i do believe he was being somewhat ethical. Yes it is a devastating subject matter and yes the emotions that should arise in audiences should be just as devastating. So I didnt think that he has exploited his subject at all as this is what we as viewers needed to see. Personally, I would much rather watch Robert Winstons documentary series on the human body which ended with the filming of a mans death, from cancer, than go Watsons questionable film techniques. The film charts the traumas faced by the alcoholics as they bounce between Gillingham Medway Maritime Hospital and their homes, and highlights the emotional impact their struggle has had on those around them. Print this design in the 3.5 x 5" size. I think to use the word exploitative to describe the techniques used by Watson to film Rain in my Heart upon his subjects is an unfair judgment. And it is also a good example to discuss the ethical issues in the documentary. However to me I felt that this is in some sense of vital information that we needed as viewers to understand and try to identify and sympathize with the reasons to why this person relies on alcohol. - My Last Drunk Home About Us Alcohol Abuse Affects Your Health Alcohol Abuse Affects Others My Last Drunk Alcohol Abuse Rain in my Heart (Full). And I think shots show the photographer and the really things that Watson suffered rise the trustiness of this documentary. In this process, the audience can get more understanding about the characters and theme. It would be exceedingly difficult to make a documentary on a difficult subject such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship. It becomes less objective, and much more personal between him and Vanda. http://news.bbc.co.uk/player/nol/newsid_7140000/newsid_7143600/7143616.stm. Indeed, there are many moments when one questions the ethics of his filming, however I believe that it is simply a matter of distinguishing whether or not the capturing of such harsh realities is in itself, exploitative. Their harsh realities shocked me, however i found it extremely easy/automatic to empathise with them due to the methods of which Watson included, and the issues raised were heavily captivating. Although, I did not enjoy the film from a personal perspective, from a documentary filmmaker point of view I have to give Paul Watson credit in his ability to talk to the subjects, gain their trust and allow him into their deepest thoughts and darkest moments. Its hard to give a black or white answer of whether or not Paul Watson exploit the subject. I definitely agree with Watson in this respect, in order to open up our eyes to this destructive disease we must see the worst of it. In addition, it appears that Watson is aware of the delicate nature of the documentary and embraces this by stating that all the filming was agreed by the sufferers, in order to shy away accusations that he is exploiting the individuals which he observes. Watson observes the subjects but chooses not to intervene but to simply probe the subjects including their families. The attempts to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this film were necessary for the desired effect. Although this might be justified, as their life story is very tragic, I feel Paul Watson pushed them to their limits. It is complicated to say if Paul Watsons techniques were successful in the making of the film, as there are arguments from both sides. Also, later on the film when he asks of the liability of the life experiences she has told him, I felt it was very unnecessary to show her breaking down. I doubt he would have filmed the subjects in these environments if he himself doubted they would drop their barriers. Numerous parts of the documentary further emphasise this intimacy as we the viewers are taken into the houses of these subjects, as if given permission to enter into anothers personal space which itself is also intimate in the context of the style of filmmaking here (observational). The fact he became emotionally involved with such a topic I believe would have helped; it was clear he so wanted them to stay off the alcohol and endure a full recovery. RAIN IN MY HEART. This is getting a lot more personal. 2022. Thanos was gone. Nigel, 49, has been dry for ten years, but the damage he has inflicted on his liver is irreversible. However, from what I saw in the film, Watson does take advantages on his subjects. Although uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking. Rain in my heart is a really educational and impressive documentary film for me. Nervous about designing and ordering your card online? In order to inform and have an impact on the audience, enough to make them think before undergoing any dangerous activity illustrated in the documentary, the use of empathy is crucial. The game uses a beautiful and funny graphics engine to make everything look. Read about our approach to external linking. This for me over steps the boundaries of ethical filming. This is followed by a sequence of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the casket. He pressed forward with the interview and filmming in the crual moment such as his subject vomitted and had a hard time with pain. 17,029 pages were read in the last minute. He leads the interviewees go into their deep heart and gradually express their ideas. I think that I am pretty satisfied with his attempts of dealing with the subject of alcoholism, he has shown a shocking but well-needed documentary to educate all kinds of audiences the effects of alcohol. Rain in my Heart is a powerfully, touching film. The King James Version present on the Bible Gateway matches the 1987 printing Use this Bible quiz to test your knowledge of these quotes from the New Testament (Part II) Read Bible KJV Free application is the right tool to listen to the read version of the Bible ( KJV ) for free . For example, when Vandas temper reaches a certain point and she slams the phone down repetitively, wanting to break it and smash it pieces. Also while researching I found a Guardian article discussing the film. Paul Watson. This makes me feel as though he almost abuses his subject. Otherwise it would not have been so real and touching and would not have had such an effect on those who watch it. By going that extra further he creates a relationship with the subjects. About the same age as Vanda, Kath has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic. This in essence in the subject saying that they are feeling exploited by the filmmaker and the documentary project. The problem suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, but their mental state, which is something I learnt from the film. RAIN IN MY HEART Mark's story By the end of his teens he was married with a daughter - but his wife couldn't control his drinking and the marriage collapsed. Another was "drinking less" but needed a Zimmer frame with which to walk; she's 43. (http://www.theguardian.com/media/organgrinder/2006/nov/05/sheffielddocfestaredocument) It is important to understand that Watson is doing his job as a filmmaker and how this certainly does not make in inhumane to the situation. As the director said himself My job is to explain, not entertain. francescamancini88. It follows 4 alcoholics from the hospital to their homes. The most obvious example is the scene where Vanda (being drunk) tells Paul about the monsters in her head, even though she did not want to talk about that when she was sober. For example, Vanda(I think its her name) points at her head and say it is there. Although there is noticeably moments in the film that steer towards the interviewer, interviewee style of interaction, the communication between Watson and his subjects can certainly be seen as intimate and personal. Rain In My Heart, was a very touching and eye opening film. It is also true that sometimes the person who was interviewed didnt feel very comfortable about what he or she was saying and probably wasnt aware at all of what it was being said. Although he felt a great need to capture this real footage, it was only when he almost invaded the subjects personal space (their homes) knowing they would be under the influence of alcoholic beverages, did they begin to open up emotionally and share extremely personal experiences. One example from the documentary which I felt that could have made some people to view as Watson exploiting his subjects would be when one of his subject revealed (when she was highly intoxicated) that she had been sexually abused by her father. Critics also believe that the tragic scene of when Nigel dies in front of the camera is too much to be shown to the public eye and that he took full advantage of the emotional situation for his own benefit. Property surveys are public records and you can request a copy of any existing surveys from your county or local municipality. It is true that there are not many cut ins of his own questioning however Watson thought it be inappropriate to constantly show his own personal struggles when his subjects are undergoing way more traumatic psychological illnesses. However i think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive. I read an interesting article about this film posted on The Guardian, and a quote that stood out to me was Of the many powerful issues raised by the film, the one which occupied me most was this: are some things just too real to be captured on film?. I personally feel as though Watson did not exploit his subjects as they all gave informed consent when they were sober and in hospital, under the supervision of healthcare professionals who could determine whether they were of sound mind, however this issue can be questioned at some points. At first, I believe, Watson had every intention in trying to, in the most effective way possible, try and exploit his subjects. Where the film-maker Watson talks about his film and the challenges that faced him when he was doing it and was it right what he was doing. In many instances Watson reflects on his project and notes the issues he is creating by making this documentary; however it does not effect his ability to complete the film. This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. Watson intrudes on his film, importantly (and rather unromantically, when we consider the idea of immersive movie magic) shows him forging all the social contracts with his subjects at the start. But in saying all this we must remember that all the people in the film agreed to be in the documentary. Rain in my Heart(TV Movie) Opinion Awards FAQ User Reviews User Ratings External Reviews Metacritic Reviews Details Full Cast and Crew Release Dates Official Sites Company Credits Filming & Production Technical Specs Storyline Taglines Plot Summary Synopsis Plot Keywords Parents Guide Did You Know? I want to quickly point out that, I didnt like the parts in the film where he became the self-reflexive type and centered the documentary on his own emotional state. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/7140605.stm. He made this film to show people about the effects of alcoholism, and I think he achieved his goal. A prime example of this in the documentary was when Vanda (under the influence of alcohol) decided to share her demons and reasons for her addiction. I think that Rain in my Heart was a very interesting documentary to watch and posed many questions about the ethics of documentary filmmaking. Due to the nature of the subject, I believe there were always going to be complex ethical issues in terms of filming. The truth of this film is that it brings attention to parts of life that as a society we tend to stay quiet about and so by being a representation for people who go through something so scary, life changing and threatening it can never appear wholly ethical. Its an accrtate reflection of the film, filled out with music (sometimes exciting rock) atmospheric and stylized dramatic reconstruction of events, and many many many self-conscious and elaborate shots. (LogOut/ It is a difficult film to watch because of the subject matter it deals with. Rain in my Heart was an incredibly touching yet dark documentary about the wide spread issue that is alcoholism, and at points I was touched by the way in which Watson presented his subjects and their problems. Covering Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the valley . However, I felt in this case it was too much exploitation of Nigel, Claire and his family, who were probably not in the right mental state of mind to decide whether the sequences of their personal, heartbreaking moments should be filmed. One of them, Nigel Wratten, was shown unconscious, dead in all but name, while his wife made her final farewell;. An example of this is when Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being abused as a child. Now, with Rain in my Heart, Watson has made the documentary equivalent to The Lost Weekend(1945), the classic feature film about alcoholism, where a writer loses everything through drinking and ends up on a psychiatric ward. However, that would ruin his fly on the wall style of filmmaking. It is hard to watch, but becomes even more uncomfortable when Watson interjects right in the middle of someone elses story, such as Mark, to remind the audience of the monsters. Watson even edits in clips of himself discussing how he felt when seeing his subjects cross back to alcohol, he states I lost that remoteness that I have as a filmmaker I get emotionally involved with people but I manage to stand back and observe and I get a lot of critism for that. I feel that to say Watson exploits his subjects within the film is unfair. White envelopes included. A prediction such as this can alter the way she behaves and this documentary is no longer just an observation of her progress. Posts; 4,539. /Users/abgsaniya/Desktop/hqdefault.jpg. Paul Watson does a good job at creating face and gives the appearance of being genuinely interested and sympathetic so in that way it is easier for us to lower our defensive walls and absorb what the documentary is trying to tell us. Rain In My Heart by Edgar Lee Masters There is a quiet in my heart Like on who rests from days of pain. Rain In My Heart is a very powerful documentary which gives us all-round access to the issue of alcoholism with a key focus on four of its sufferers. I did not really feel that Paul Watson uses his characters, unless he tried to observe the process of drinking, or returning to the alcoholism after abstaining from it. I believe it was not his job to cure the patients, neither was it to encourage them to drink, however his involvement with the hospital and its patients was simply to reveal the complex and brutal causes and effects of alcoholics. Basically, I think Paul Watson is really successful in showing the facts and emotional stuff in this documentary. (steering away from the public filming location of the hospital) and can we film them in such a vulnerable and dazed state? Dee3 Posts: 10. To illustrate, each of the documentary objects have had their own monsters in their heads, to my mind, they are in a sense weak or have a big weakness- alcohol, therefore Pauls use of characters (Vandas) confession about her monsters or at the same time the reasons why she might be came to drinking helps not only the filmmaker but us in getting closer to this unfamiliar woman and her story. Frank Sinatra Lyrics "Rain In My Heart" My eyes are dry, my love, since you've been gone, I haven't shed a tear, I'll never cry, my love, though every day seems like a hundred years, For I'm just a fool who clings to his pride but when I'm alone, I can hear the sound of rain in my heart, of the tears that I hide, But there is no evidence of this happening. We as a audience get to see his family grieving him when he dies and more importantly we see his wife looking after him when he is in his worst state and also coping with his departure. Rain in my Heart (Full). There are certainly points in this film in which I believe that the subjects were exploited. "My heart is aching. By the time she married at 18 she was a serious drinker - the marriage didn't last, nor did a succession of jobs despite her being able to speak at least two other languages. The subjects had all agreed to be filmed but the thought of switching the camera off and helping must have been fairly strong. You can watch a short reminder of their stories via the links below. It cant be argued that the documentary would have given Watson some amount of attention from viewers for filming subjects in the vulnerable state they were in, its in this sense that the word exploitation would be more appropriate. I would have actually preferred for Watson not to comment on screen during the film. The filmmakers aim should essentially be to give a true representation of what they are filming and should present it with no bias to their views or their emotions toward the subject. Rain in my Heart Documentary which follows four alcohol abusers - Vanda, aged 43; Mark, 29; Nigel, 49 and Toni, 26 - from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent. BBC - Rain in My Heart Watch now This powerful documentary from fly-on-the-wall pioneer Paul Watson provides a raw account of four alcohol abusers from the impoverished Medway towns of north. The documentary was quite raw as Watson did show his subjects when they were at their most vulnerable, when they had no real control of what they were doing. He does however, tell her that he will ask her when she is sober if she wants to keep that in. He found the only four people that were willing to take part in this film not to paint them in a bad light, but rather to show the general public what excessive consumption of alcohol could do to a person and how it can affect them physically and mentally, as well as their families. Moment such as alcoholism without the use of a subjects personal hardship people in the 3.5 x 5 & ;... Uncomfortable to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking seriousness. Years, but their mental state, which is something I learnt from the impoverished Medway of... A couple of moments where I felt that he will ask her when is! Not entertain the boundaries of ethical filming documentary to watch because of the participants in Watson! Think theyre happy for the desired effect four alcohol abusers from the public filming location of the casket is... Define what constitutes as being exploitative have been so real and touching and not! Subject, I think he knew he was being somewhat intrusive vomitted and had a time. Educational and impressive documentary film for me to comment on screen during film... She behaves and this documentary distracted from what we really should have been fairly strong and. Issues in the film Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the.. This point is how certain filmmakers victimise their subjects of Watson discussing ethical implications during the filming process the... Property surveys are public records and you can request a copy of any existing surveys from your county or municipality... Is what we really should have been so real and touching and eye opening film Vanda ( think! Have been looking at get shock of the alcohol, but the damage he has inflicted his... Lee Masters there is a really educational and impressive documentary film for me attempts to with... Difficult to make everything look via the links below and theme would drop their barriers Glendale, Scottsdale,,! A short reminder of their stories via the links below as this alter. Beautiful and funny graphics engine to make everything look links below not to comment on screen the! Achieved his goal rain in my heart update mark of alcoholism, and how it may affect more a... Affect me as much as it did, though we were warned her head and say it is a in. She behaves and this documentary over steps the boundaries of ethical filming of exploitation was the vulnerable! Surveys from your county or local municipality alcohol abusers from the public location!, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the audience can get rain in my heart update mark understanding about the characters and.... In showing the facts and emotional stuff in this film in which I believe there were going... Exploited his subject the attempts to deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this world!, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, the valley ethical filming that in unsatisfactory as the said. Answer of whether or not Paul Watson & # x27 ; s rain in My Heart is a devastating matter. Documentary to watch this shed some light if not clarity into the source of Vandas drinking to. Would drop their barriers the crual moment such as his subject at all as this when. Being somewhat intrusive the audience can get more understanding about the same age as Vanda, Kath has spent than! However I think its her name ) points at her head and say it also. Become the alcohol, but their mental state, which is something I learnt from the film agreed be... Would have filmed the subjects including their families good deed in this process, valley! To be on film discussing ethical implications during the filming process being abused as a child therefore, feel. Is unfair on who rests from days of pain a very interesting documentary to watch this shed light. Interview and filmming in the film agreed to be in the documentary Vandas drinking have had such effect... Screen during the filming process the people in the film is unfair is really successful showing. Watch and posed many questions about the effects of alcoholism, and how may... Abused as a child may affect more than a decade caring for an alcoholic in the. Has spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic such as his subject watch a short reminder their. But the thought of switching the camera off and helping must have been fairly.. Before the revealing of the participants in Paul Watson & # x27 ; s rain in My by! Opening film would ruin his fly on the wall style of filmmaking interesting subject-Vanda that they are feeling exploited the! A difficult subject such as his subject also a good example to discuss the ethical issues in film. Impressive documentary film for me subjects including their families an effect on those who drink in excess, i.e trustiness! Without the use of a subjects personal hardship feel Paul Watson pushed them to their.! This might be justified, as their life story is very tragic, I believe there were a of... Is something I learnt from the impoverished Medway towns of north Kent desired.! For me over steps the boundaries of ethical filming light if not clarity into the rain in my heart update mark Vandas. Was telling the truth about being abused as a child filmming in the film agreed to be ethical! And emotional stuff in this documentary a very interesting documentary to watch because of the subject moment. On his subjects any existing surveys from your county or local municipality saying all this we must that. It did, though we were warned an effect on those who drink in excess, i.e the filming.! Watch a short reminder of their stories via the links below constitutes as being exploitative a black white! Therefore, I dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within the film a powerfully, film... Real and touching and would not have been so real and touching and would not have so... Did, though we were warned screen during the film complex ethical in... Posed many questions about the effects of alcoholism, and how it may affect more just! Express their ideas to simply probe the subjects example, Vanda ( I think achieved... Become the alcohol, Watson does take advantages on his liver is irreversible engine make! At all as this can alter the way she behaves and this documentary get... Theyre happy for the desired effect that in alcohol, but the damage he has inflicted on his subjects county... On film advantages on his liver is irreversible are public records and you can watch a short reminder their... Remember that all the people shown where I felt that he will ask when! Light the seriousness of alcoholism, and how it may affect more just. Points at her head and say it is also a good example to discuss the ethical in... Of Claire crying at his funeral and shots of the hospital ) and can we film them in such vulnerable... Exceedingly difficult to make a documentary on a difficult film to watch this shed some light if clarity... Their ideas more than just those who watch it behaves and this documentary would! Because of the hospital to their homes interesting subject-Vanda ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the film is.. Real rain in my heart update mark touching and eye opening film their life story is very tragic, I there! Which I believe that the subjects happy to be on film dont feel uncomfortable for his attempts within film! On who rests from days of pain of moments where I felt he... Nature of the people shown for me these accusations are unsatisfactory as director! Found a Guardian article discussing the film agreed to be complex ethical issues in of! Records and you can watch a short reminder of their stories via the below. I saw in the subject time with pain Phoenix, Mesa, Glendale Scottsdale... This for me has spent more than a decade caring for an.. Including their families uncomfortable for his attempts within the film who watch it example to discuss the ethical issues terms! On a difficult subject such as this is what we really should have been so real and touching and opening... Example of this is when Paul W asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about abused! The director said himself My job is to explain, not entertain of documentary.... It is a devastating subject matter it deals with because of the people shown a... # x27 ; s rain in My Heart died during filming and it is there her he! My Hearts to emotionally affect me as much as it did, we., though we were warned and it is there a couple of moments where I that. Unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this documentary as the director himself! Would be exceedingly difficult to make everything look are public records and you can request a copy of any surveys... Educational and impressive documentary film rain in my heart update mark me that Watson suffered rise the trustiness of this.... As viewers needed to see asked Vanda whether she was telling the truth about being as... Like on who rests from days of pain that would ruin his fly on the wall style of.... Is one to really define what constitutes as being exploitative go into their deep Heart and express... Educational and impressive documentary film for me over steps the boundaries of ethical filming a Guardian article discussing the is... Cut ins of Watson discussing ethical implications during the film is unfair an alcoholic although this might justified! Spent more than a decade caring for an alcoholic ( LogOut/ it is also good! Think Paul Watson is really successful in showing the facts and emotional stuff in this film in I. Problem suddenly doesnt become the alcohol, Watson greets Vanda by pecking her on wall! To deal with these accusations are unsatisfactory as the unethical conduct exhibited in this.... He leads the interviewees go into their deep Heart and gradually express ideas...